π Emergent Prompting Cheat Sheet
How to get the best results for the fewest credits β straight from Emergent's official docs.
Sources: emergent.sh/learn/vibe-coding-prompts Β· help.emergent.sh/first-app Β· how-to-create-a-business-app Β· pulled 2026-06-17
β = something you already did on the PeptidePal build (so you're already doing this right).
1 Β· The first-prompt template
Create an app for [PURPOSE] that includes:
- [FEATURE 1]
- [FEATURE 2]
- [FEATURE 3]
- [DESIGN STYLE / vibe]
- Start with a one-sentence objective so it doesn't guess your goal.
- 3β5 features for the first build β keep scope small.
- Add one line of "vibe" for design (e.g. "clean dashboard, light theme") β don't over-specify visuals yet.
2 Β· Writing the initial prompt
3 Β· Iterating (after the first build)
- Let the planning Q&A run; answer briefly, then say "Start building based on what we discussed."
- One change at a time. Bundling fixes "confuses the AI." Short, targeted follow-ups.
- Use spatial language for layout: "left / right / top / bottom," "place the 3 images in one row."
- Bug protocol: test it yourself first β grab the actual error (F12 console) β say expected vs. actual β screenshot β one error per prompt, don't mix bugs with feature requests.
- If it fails, rephrase & simplify β don't repeat. 2β4 tries is normal.
- Copy your project before a major feature so you can roll back.
π° 4 Β· Fewest credits
- Small, focused initial scope (3β5 features) β fewer rebuilds.
- Structured lists β fewer misbuilds β fewer costly rebuild cycles.
- One change at a time β avoids expensive regressions.
- Don't over-spec design early β avoids double rebuilds (logic + UI).
- Roles / workflows / integrations up front β avoids re-scaffolding auth, routing, database.
- At ~10k records: prompt "Add indexes on the most-queried fields" β load times drop 5β10Γ.
- Name exact files when changing existing code (our addition) β stops credit-burning "exploration."
β
Do
- One clear objective sentence
- User actions + workflows
- Bulleted requirements
- Roles, pages, integrations named
- Examples + success criteria
- Refine one change at a time
- Test first, report one bug at a time
- Rephrase if it misses
π« Don't
- Vague shorthand ("approval system")
- Walls of text
- Bundle many changes in one prompt
- Mix bugs + feature requests
- Over-specify design on build 1
- Repeat the same failed prompt
- Panic at 1β2 misses (2β4 is normal)
+ Our hard-won additions (PeptidePal)
- Repeat your guardrails + a "do NOT touch" list every prompt (summaries drop context).
- When low on credits, do single-item prompts so a mid-run cutout never leaves half-finished code.
- Verify every "files changed" summary + keep the test suite green β re-run after each change (an overlapping edit once silently broke a model).
- Don't blindly trust its code-review β it told us to break correct Python once.
- Never let it commit
.env β placeholders only.